Written by AJ Bell investment director Russ Mould.
The debate over BP’s bumper profits and the rights and wrongs of a windfall tax looks set to continue but the facts of the matter are that the oil major’s latest plans to return cash to its investors mean the FTSE 100’s members are poised to set a new all-time record for share buybacks in 2022.
BP’s plan to buy back $2.5 billion of stock in the second quarter of this year, coupled with announcements from Next and Endeavour Mining about their buyback activity, means that FTSE 100 firms are now planning £37 billion of buybacks this year, to surpass the prior peak of £34.9 billion in 2018.
Source: Company accounts. *2022 based on announcements to date
BP’s $2.5 billion second-quarter plan supplements the first-quarter’s $1.6 billion outlay on buybacks and catapults the firm into fourth place in terms of this year’s buyback announcements by FTSE 100 members. It also cements the oil and gas giant’s third-placed ranking for buybacks since 2000.
Ten largest FTSE 100 firms for share buybacks
|Share buybacks (£ billion)|
|Share buybacks (£ billion)|
|British American Tobacco|
|British American Tobacco|
Source: Company accounts
This buyback largesse complements analysts’ forecasts for aggregate dividend payments from the FTSE 100 of £81.2 billion (and that is before any special dividends). The dividends equate to a forward dividend yield of 3.9% and the buybacks add a further 1.8% to that, to take the cash yield from the FTSE to 5.7%.
Source: Company accounts, Marketscreener, analysts’ consensus forecasts
That may provide some succour to patient investors who are looking at a broadly flat capital return from the FTSE 100 in the year to date. This is the second-best performance among major indices in the world in 2022 so far, trailing on Brazil’s modest gains, in local currency terms.
Those planned cash returns may therefore be helping to persuade investors to stick with UK equities rather than look elsewhere, although the danger remains that buyback plans are revised and dividend forecasts prove over-optimistic, should a recession or other unexpected development strike.
Buybacks are particularly subject to revision, as there is far less stigma when a management team quietly parks a programme compared to when a boardroom has to sanction a dividend cut.
In 2020, FTSE 100 firms returned £10.2 billion to their shareholders via buybacks but scrapped plans to buy back £10.3 billion more as the pandemic spread, lockdowns were imposed and the globe plunged into a recession, to the great detriment of corporate profits cash flows and in some cases balance sheets.
Cynics will also flag how buybacks tend to be pro-cyclical. Buyback activity reached its high in 2006-07, as animal spirits were running most strongly just before the Great Financial Crisis swept the world. Over £60 billion in buybacks across those two years did nothing to support share prices in 2007-09 and buybacks slowed to just £3 billion in 2009 by the time the crisis was passing, and equity markets had collapsed and thus become much cheaper.
Buybacks reached their next zenith in 2018 and buyback activity peaked that year, too, so management teams’ record of buying high rather than low may give some investors pause for thought as to whether buybacks are a potential contrarian indicator, especially in light of global equities’ spring woes.”
The case for and against share buybacks
America’s Securities Exchange Act of 1934 outlawed share buybacks as it deemed large-scale share buybacks could be a form of wilful share price manipulation. That was only repealed in 1982 by the Reagan administration, with rule 10b-18, and since then buybacks have become increasingly popular. The UK has followed America’s lead to some degree here, although dividends are still the more common means for returning cash to investors.
There are four clear arguments in favour of share buybacks.
- If a company is generating surplus cash, then it can return this money to shareholders and let them decide what to do with it, rather than splurge it on an unnecessary acquisition or capacity increases. This is a particularly acute issue at a time when interest rates remain low, even after some recent increases, and, as a result, firms are not gaining a decent return on any cash holdings.
- Buybacks can work for individuals depending on their tax situation, and whether they prefer to be taxed on a capital gain (buyback) or dividend (income).
- Anyone who elects to retain their shares when a firm buys back stock will have an enhanced stake in the company and thus be entitled to a bigger share of future dividends (assuming there are any).
- Buybacks can also suggest that a management team feels a company’s shares are undervalued, so any move to buy purchase stock can be seen as a vote of confidence in the firm’s near and long-term trading prospects.
Equally, there are four reasons to treat share buybacks with some degree of caution and not blindly welcome them all as a good thing.
- History shows companies have a habit of buying stock back during bull markets (when their stocks tend to be more expensive) and not doing so during bear ones (when their stock tends to be much cheaper). For example, buybacks in the US topped out in 2007 and collapsed in 2008 and 2009 only to reach new highs in 2018 as stock prices reached new peaks. A similar pattern can be seen in the UK and the higher share prices have gone, the more buybacks there seem to have been in 2021 and 2022 on both sides of the Atlantic.
- The tendency among some management teams to buy high rather than low could therefore question whether executives are sufficiently objective when they sanction a buyback to show the market, they feel their stock is undervalued.
- A buyback could be used to massage earnings per share figures by reducing the share count at limited cost. This could be used to trigger management bonuses or stock options, courtesy of some near-term financial engineering.
- There is also the risk that firms buy back stock using debt, potentially weakening their balance sheets and competitive position in the long term (although the same danger lurks with dividends). Any short-term financial engineering could therefore damage a firm’s long-term ability to invest in its customer proposition and defend its market share to the potential detriment of profits, cash flow, the ability to return cash and – ultimately – the share price.