Failed banks reminiscent of the S&L crisis not the GFC:” Analysis from Sparrows Capital’s Mark Northway

by | Jun 20, 2023

In poetry, the alternative rhyme scheme delivers assonance every other line. Investors might want to take note of this construct as they review portfolio risks against the background of today’s complex environment, says Mark Northway (pictured), Investment Director at Sparrows Capital, which runs the SCore MPS suite.

With the collapse of First Republic, the third US bank to fail in roughly two months, investors and regulators are fixated on the 2008/09 crisis and are crafting their response to the current troubles through that lens.

But this emerging crisis isn’t rhyming with the preceding line; it’s rhyming with the one before that: The Savings and Loan (S&L) crisis of the 1980s and 1990s.

Risky estimation

The market is downplaying the significance of the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), Signature, and First Republic.

SVB was the 16th largest bank in the US, and its collapse was the second largest in US history, behind Washington Mutual in 2008.

Experts are assessing the current crisis in line with the credit issues that bedeviled financial institutions in the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), and are correctly concluding that the credit quality of bank balance sheets is strong.

But banks are not caught is a credit crisis; rather, they appear to be facing the problems of repositioning in the face of rapid interest rate rises necessary to tackle inflation.

Exactly this issue caused a third of US Savings and Loan Associations (S&Ls) to close between 1986 and 1995. Hikes in interest rates left S&Ls borrowing at rates higher than the earnings on their customer loan book.

Traditionally, rising rates are positive for banks, but back then, and again now, the speed and size of rate rises didn’t allowed banks the time to suitably reposition themselves.

Driving blind

The failed institutions and their regulators have failed to carry out the most basic scenario analysis to model how their business would function in a period of interest rate normalisation.

Rising rates have impacted both sides of the balance sheet. On the asset side, high quality fixed rate government bond portfolios have fallen in value while, on the liability side, traditionally high quality deposits have proven too be ephemeral.

Digital banking is a two-edged sword. It makes it faster and easier to place money with a bank, but it also makes it quicker to move it back out. Bank runs in the 1980s and 1990s involved physical queues and happened over days and weeks. In today’s constantly connected world, it takes minutes or hours.

Indeed, in just one week in March, US savers put a net $120 billion into money market funds, the largest such inflow since June 2020, much of which will have come directly from bank deposits.

Early estimates of unrealised US banking losses stood at $620 billion in early March when SVB entered hot water[1]. More recent estimates put losses at a far higher $1.7 trillion[2], which exceeds the aggregate regulatory capital of the sector.

Such figures suggest that this is not idiosyncratic risk – the result of poor decisions relevant only to the institutions that have publicly failed. Rather, it suggests that the US banking system is running on empty.

Institutional inexperience

Most of today’s investors have not experienced a high-yield environment, and so don’t know how to operate in one, or how to transition from the past decade’s rock-bottom rate landscape.

Combined with the optimistic groupthink that this is not a crisis, and the naive hope that central bankers will save the world again, the horizon looks a bit stormy to say the least.

At the same time, the effect of interest rate rises is not limited to the financial sector. Rate rises have a real-world application that severely curtails household spending and curbs business expansion as the cost of capital increases. The knock-on effects in terms of both valuation and economic activity come later, and have yet to be fully felt.

Market participants don’t seem to be aware of the tectonic plates moving underneath them. Mark Twain suggested that history doesn’t repeat itself, but it rhymes; but we’re missing the point that the current issues don’t rhyme with the GFC, they rhyme with the S&L crisis instead.

Mark Northway is Investment Director at Sparrows Capital which runs the SCore MPS Suite



Related articles

Fundhouse: Is Low-Risk Investing Really Low-Risk?

Fundhouse: Is Low-Risk Investing Really Low-Risk?

It is conventional wisdom that investment decisions are usually informed by an assessment of the investor's willingness to take risk (their risk profile). But what is investment risk? It is usually defined in two broad ways. First is by looking back at a very similar...

Yield advantage presents investment opportunities

Yield advantage presents investment opportunities

The post-pandemic inflation shock and rate-hiking cycle produced a generational reset higher in bond yields, creating a compelling multiyear outlook for fixed income as inflation recedes and risks build in other markets. That’s the view of PIMCO’s Richard Clarida,...

Trending stories

Join our mailing list

Subscribe to our mailing list to receive regular updates!