– AIC warns questions persist about investor protection
– Concernย that review of retail distribution will be undertaken before LTAF tested in difficult markets
Theย Association of Investment Companies (AIC)ย has responded to the FCAโsย policy statementย today,ย PS21/14ย A new authorised fund regime for investing in long term assets.
Richard Stone(pictured), Chief Executive of the Association of Investment Companies (AIC),ย said:ย โFollowing publication of the FCAโs policy statement today, a number of our concerns remain. In particular, we fear the 90-day redemption notice periods will not prove sufficient, particularly in times of stressed markets. If too short, this could threaten theย long-term resilience of the LTAF. It will be a challenge for managers to set adequate notice periods, especially if the structure also incorporates leverage. It is difficult to see how investors can be assured there wonโt be a run on an LTAFโs liquidity when market sentiment turns negative.
โItโs good to see that wide retail distribution of LTAFs will not initially be possible. Indeed, the success of the policy as set out by the FCA hinges on the launch of products and DC pension schemes investing in them. The long-term stability of the product or wider retail engagement are not identified as success factors.
โI am concerned that the FCA is proposing a review to consider wider retail distribution as early as 2022. This is too soon. There wonโt have been time forย LTAFsย to be tested through difficult markets. Pension schemes and other institutions can evaluate the downsides of the LTAF alongside its proposed benefits,ย but retail investors do not typically have the same resources or ability to assess those risks.ย Thereย is a risk of investor harmย if the product is not allowed to prove itself through the economic cycle.
โWe are still waiting for the results of the FCAโs consultation on open-ended property funds even though it closed nearly a year ago.ย This shows howย difficultย it can beย to address flaws once a product has beenย established.ย Weย need to be certainย this wonโt leave LTAF investors with similar long-term problems.
โRules in the property sector require a fund to be suspended when there is material uncertainty over the valuation of its assets. These rules protectedย investors in property funds during the COVID crisis.ย LTAF investors,ย who could also have exposure to property,ย would benefit if the same rules were in place duringย inevitableย future times of economic turmoil.
โInvestment companies have been offering investors a tried and tested wayย toย access long-term illiquid assets for many decades.ย Theyย offer daily trading, a robust regulatory structure and independent boardsย of directors.ย Like all investments, investment companiesย were tested through theย COVIDย crisis. Theirย resilience demonstrates the benefits of theย investment companyย structure which we believe will continue to provide the best way for investors to avoid the risks of liquidity mismatches and suspensions.โ




